Search for: "IDE v STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC" Results 301 - 320 of 1,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
That principle has yet greater force when "the administrative interpretation alters the federal state framework by permitting federal encroachment upon a traditional state power," id. at 173, like landlord-tenant relations, see Lindsey v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am by Joseph D. Kearney
The land north of Madison (see another such map, id. at 392) was projected for development when the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice and the SEC to remand the Goldman case back to the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
(Discussed with its conseqeunce for state liability with respect to the conduct of their SOEs HERE). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm by Davin Rosborough
Holder in 2013 — when the court eliminated the requirement that states with a strong history of discriminatory voting laws receive preapproval for new voting laws by a federal court or the Department of Justice — send a plain message. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
That restriction to the statutory usage of "other legal process" is important here, for in the abstract the department does use legal process as the avenue to reimbursement: by a federal legal process the Commissioner appoints the department a representative payee, and by a state legal process the department makes claims against the accounts kept by the state treasurer. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In 2009 and 2013, the Department of Justice issued memorandums outlining a policy against intruding on state legalization schemes or prosecuting certain individuals who comply with state law. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Alito's dissent in California correctly stated the framework from Allen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Datzman then contacted Sergeant Jason Johnson in the Vacaville Police Department. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Plaintiff was merely an ‘incidental beneficiary to its client’s malpractice insurance policy’ (id.). [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
These include opinions from Supreme Court Justices including Justices Sotomayor, Thomas, O'Connor, Ginsburg, and a six-Justice per curiam signed on to by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]