Search for: "In Interest of T. S. III"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 8:17 am
While we don’t claim to be lawyers who are experts in FDA law, from our review, Schedule III drugs include many that require prescriptions to use – including anabolic steroids and barbiturates – not exactly the kind of drugs one usually sees advertised on TV. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:08 pm
Kuhne III Whether you are an experienced litigator or just starting your practice, you won't want to head to court or to a deposition without this book. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:49 pm
Katyal’s proposal adds formality to the current process, and would substitute “expert lawyers” for the already-partly-antagonistic interests of lawyers in State, DOJ, DOD, and the Intelligence Community. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 4:01 am
(This situation is more like the star-crossed lovers of this famous passage than you might think; let’s hope this session’s Act III doesn’t end the same way.) [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Where opposition proceedings are pending before the EPO, the opponent’s status may be transferred to a third party by universal succession or as part of the opponent’s business assets, together with the assets in the interests of which the opposition was filed (see G 4/88 and Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 6th Edition 2010, VII.C.5.1.2). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
Best quote (offered to put the Ninth Circuit's reversal rate in context): "They typically don't take your case to say, 'You did a great job! [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
” To argue, as the ACLU’s Gabe Rottman suggested in a blog post, that Twitter’s services don’t count for purposes of the statute because they don’t involve “coordination” between the company and the DFTO seems just wrong. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am
And given the time scale and generality of the product they're drafting, the normal "special interest" machinations aren't as clear. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 11:28 am
Further, Congress plausibly desired Dahda’s approach in order to encourage strict adherence to Title III. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Accordingly, the “concrete underlying harm” in the case was the cruise line’s infringement on Havana Docks’s property interest. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:29 am
Ct. 764 (2007)-->For there to be a case or controversy under Article III, the dispute must be "definite and concrete, touching the legal relations of parties having adverse legal interests," "real and substantial," and "admi[t] of specific relief through a decree of a conclusive character, as distinguished from an opinion advising what the law would beupon a hypothetical state of facts. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
The FBI isn’t saying. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Privately negotiated w/o input from public or public interest groups. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:50 am
They needed to show a true conflict and that foreign states’ interests were stronger than California’s. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am
According to the court the deceased brothers didn’t still own their claims, when they died those property interests transferred to their probate estates as new owners. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:14 pm
(iii) A lawyer reviews it. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
., William T. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
Stolz (chair), T. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:36 am
In a broader context, T 1621/16 will be of interest for practitioners struggling with the allowability of amendments under Article 123(2) EPC based on multiple selections from lists of converging alternatives. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
” “…Linda S. [read post]
