Search for: "In Matter of Adams" Results 301 - 320 of 6,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Editor's Note: Adam Emmerich is a partner in the corporate department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz focusing primarily on mergers and acquisitions and securities law matters. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:11 pm by Michael Heise
In a recent (and mercifully brief) review essay, Empirical Constitutional Studies (reviewing Adam Chilton & Mila Versteeg's How Constitutional Rights Matter (OUP, 2020)), Arthur Dyevre (KU Leuven Centre for Legal Theory and Empirical Jurisprudence) takes the occasion to opine more generally on ELS' recent (and growing) "intrusion" into the comparative constitutional law field. [read post]
Editor's Note: Adam Emmerich is a partner in the corporate department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz focusing primarily on mergers and acquisitions and securities law matters. [read post]
You’ve no doubt heard about Maroon 5 front man and The Voice star Adam Levine being sugar bombed recently, most likely in reference to the band’s current hit song Sugar. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Firing a government employee based on his speech on matters of public concern is generally unconstitutional. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Rather, Adams’s testimony is evidence, at most, of 'ineffective or even incompetent . . . handling of the matter,' which 'does not rise to the level of deliberate action required by our precedent.' [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm by Eduardo Penalver
  I'm not saying I agree with those slogans as a matter of IP policy, just that, in my opinion, the middle ground that Adams seeks is pretty much foreclosed by the extreme position of the well-connected content-owners who have pretty much had a free hand in designing the current copyright system. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:15 am by Eric Lipman
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy last night, Orin Kerr posted a critique of Adam Liptak's critique of recent Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:30 pm
The following editorial from Adam Cohen of the N.Y. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:37 am by Pierre Bergeron
In a recent article by Adam Liptak in the New York Times, he noted that several commenters have questioned the value of oral argument at the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:38 am
Nagourney answered the query, the substance of which he says was minor, and went to bed, thinking the matter resolved.What was the query? [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:53 am
Posted by: Adam EllsworthAs the PTAB recently admitted, "the case law regarding 101 continues to evolve" (Ex parte Fickle, Appeal No. 2011-007587).I thought it might be helpful to look at cases decided by the PTAB in the last month to see if there are any patterns in how the Board is deciding issues of patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:53 am
Posted by: Adam EllsworthAs the PTAB recently admitted, "the case law regarding 101 continues to evolve" (Ex parte Fickle, Appeal No. 2011-007587).I thought it might be helpful to look at cases decided by the PTAB in the last month to see if there are any patterns in how the Board is deciding issues of patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm by Daniel Nazer
Big news from Texas: Adam Carolla has settled with the podcasting patent troll Personal Audio. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:48 pm
    Instead, he wants to further complicate the matter, bringing the question of damages reform into the mix. [read post]