Search for: "In Re: B " Results 301 - 320 of 30,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:53 am
There are only a few days left to participate in the $18,500,000 In re Bayer AG Securities Litigation (No. 03 cv 1546 SDNY) settlement by filing your proof of claim form (Bayer AG, Xetra: BAY). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:54 pm by Abdo Law Firm
Isolated Incidents, Not Likely to Re-offend: There are many instances where we have advocated for ZERO probation, or for an abbreviated period of probation, on behalf of clients that are not likely to re-offend. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
R. 32.1(e), the CAFC has re-designated as precedential its opinion in In re GO & Associates, LLC, Appeal No. 2022-1961 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
“Standing and capacity related dismissals are not on the merits” (Favourite Ltd. v Cico, 208 AD3d 99 [1st Dept 2022]), and are deemed to be “without prejudice” (B and H Florida Notes LLC v Ashkenazi, 182 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
August 13, 2013) Among other points, the text observesIn re: Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 216 F.R.D. at 172 (corporation is obligated to produce one or more Rule 30(b)(6) witnesses who are thoroughly educated about the noticed deposition topics and facts known to the corporation or its counsel).As to the matter of facts, can the Court order that a party depose a fact witness INSTEAD OF a 30(b)(6) witness? [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:14 am
Section 522(b)(3)(B) provides for the exemption of property held as a tenant by the entireties. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Misty Dalke
In In re Royal Bank of Scotland PLC Securities Litigation, S.D.N.Y., 09 Civ. 300 (DAB) 1/11/2011, the court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims on the basis of the Supreme Court's decision in Morrison. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:41 pm
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has amended the CPSIA by exempting electronic products from the lead limitation provided by Section 101(b)(2) provided the component part is not accessible "if it is not physically exposed by reason of a sealed covering or casing and does not become physically exposed through reasonably foreseeable use and abuse of the product including swallowing, mouthing, breaking, or other children’s activities, and the aging of the product, as… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:53 am by Patti Spencer
Unlike 401(k) plans, administrators of 403(b) plans are not considered fiduciaries - and, therefore, have no legal or ethical obligation to monitor plans to ensure they're in the best interest of the participants. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 8:26 am
For example, the Lindt-case does not mention specifically whether re-filings and re-applications qualify for determining bad faith.The Board’s attention thus focused on the General Court’s decision in Pelikan (T-136-11). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs first contended that they had a protectible property interest in the re-zoning of their property based on the preliminary B-PUD application that was submitted to the Butler County officials. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:34 am by John L. Welch
In the first, In re City of Houston, 101 USPQ2d 1534 (TTAB 2012) [precedential], District of Columbia, the Board affirmed a Section 2(b) refusal to register the official seal of the City of Houston for various municipal services. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:36 am by Kate Fort
This morning the Supreme Court denied cert in the Utah Supreme Court case establishing a federal standard of reasonableness for a putative father to acknowledge or establish paternity. [read post]