Search for: "In Re: White v."
Results 301 - 320
of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Cabrales and State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
In re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
The above is a fictional caption, but it looks like we’re heading that way after lawsuits filed this week across our Litigation Nation. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:52 am
In fact, if you’re loitering in Manhattan, Yonkers, Brooklyn, White Plains, New City or Queens, the crime is still the same. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
In 1997, the United States Courts of Appeals, Second Circuit, stated in Francis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
In Midler v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
But Congress only has thirty days after notification to pass an AECA joint resolution of disapproval, meaning that the White House controls the timing. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:26 am
State of Iowa v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Stern (In re Marshall), 600 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2010) (pdf). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
I’ve never had a client refuse dismissal because it was granted by an old white male judge. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
United States: In Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm
Even if you’re male, White, American, or “straight,” you still have the possibility of pursuing – and winning – a federal discrimination lawsuit. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:27 am
The case of Allard v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:13 am
Torres v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:49 am
First, Obama's election will have no effect on the pending case of Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re looks at the Court’s “unusual pro-criminal defendant summary reversal in the Double Jeopardy case” Martinez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
Tuesday’s argument in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:14 am
Yet, on that fact, I will now remark, since the Fourth Circuit recently decided United States v. [read post]
