Search for: "In Re Armstrong"
Results 301 - 320
of 617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 3:09 am
The re-airing of a 60 Minutes segment last month about SpaceX generated some criticism from Apollo-era officials that they were unfairly portrayed as being negative about SpaceX, which led a few weeks later to a clarification from 60 Minutes host Scott Pelley that Neil Armstrong in particular had not testified against commercial space. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
It’s an excuse to connect with someone you wouldn’t otherwise, it’s good content and just about anyone loves hearing “hey, I think you’re an expert on this subject, would you like to talk about it some more? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
[Tampa Bay Times] * “I don’t care what the law says, you’re getting a summons. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
[Tampa Bay Times] * “I don’t care what the law says, you’re getting a summons. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:48 am
" Since the Court made no ruling on the actual merits of the case, Armstrong's legal team will re-file a shorter complaint, but the 7-time Tour winner did not have a good start to this lawsuit [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:46 am
Armstrong can refile it. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Alas, we’re back at it with another roundup. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Armstrong, Mr. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Hyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:05 am
If you’re anything like me (and for your sake, let’s hope you’re not), you’ve spent a bit too much time watching soccer over the last few weeks as Europe’s best teams have competed for the European championship, in a tournament most often referred to simply as the Euros. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
This letter was prompted by reaction to the re-airing of the “60 Minutes” segment earlier this month by Chris Kraft, who argued that the segment distorted the views of Armstrong, Gene Cernan, and others. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Never be afraid to say you’re sorry. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:42 am
For example, the legal doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata are both based on the principle that you cannot re-litigate an issue that's already been decided by a court. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:03 am
Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly & Davis – Try saying that fast four times. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:05 am
You know, I wish they would come and visit, and see the hard work that we’re doing here. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
Other famous names have joined the fray, including international bike star Lance Armstrong, who has previously battled cancer. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
Other famous names have joined the fray, including international bike star Lance Armstrong, who has previously battled cancer. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:56 pm
I say this every single time but, seriously, it’s always great having another one of the top law firms in the world jump on the LexBlog Network—especially when they’re adding to the excellent privacy law community on LXBN. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:53 am
Scott Armstrong and Kesten C. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
You can find below the information from the LSA program re: our little gathering on crim law and crim procedure. [read post]
