Search for: "In Re Goldstein"
Results 301 - 320
of 845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:55 pm
" So, the Justice wondered, "How do we know they're not monsters? [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” So, the Justice wondered, “How do we know they’re not monsters? [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
(And while you’re at it, see if they know what the hell a “bolo” is.) [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
United States, in which the Court heard re-argument on the constitutionality of the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:50 pm
Goldstein & Mary Sue Henifin, “Reference Guide on Toxicology,” in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 633 (3d ed. 2011). [4] Michael D. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:39 pm
When it comes to Google maps, according to Brown, there’s a general acceptance that they’re accurate. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:40 am
And they’re right. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
“They’re not trying to get in our way. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Super Bowl ads http://t.co/SnTMyGZi3l -> Validity of the Rubik's Cube as a shape mark upheld http://t.co/ohBRcCWgTc -> Another three IP books for review http://t.co/V57Jz6SkRB -> Copyright pitfalls in New Zealand: lessons to be learnt from Jeanswest v G-Star http://t.co/qNOJKhEGY3 -> Ninth Circuit Remands 'Jersey Boys' Copyright Infringement Case https://t.co/vIEdk2iMXi -> Twenty Years Down the Road: A Q&A With Paul Goldstein, Author of Copyright's… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:16 pm
By Zev Goldstein, Esq. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am
Commentary comes from Richard Re, who discusses the standing issue at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
Given your Nostradamus-like track record, we’re interested in your predictions regarding the short-term and long-term effect of the Aereo decision—any thoughts? [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re weighs in on last week’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
If the father had the children most of the time, his relocation would have warranted re-opening the custody arrangement. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
Goldstein. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:48 am
Goldstein, and Michael R. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 3:49 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in M&G Polymers. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:09 am
If what Pearlman described is more that just a passing anecdote then we're on the wrong side of the fulcrum. [read post]
