Search for: "In Re Henning"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 12:07 am
As a divorced-divorce lawyer, I know firsthand that divorce can knock the wind out of your sails, and kick you when you’re down. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:43 am
It was like asking the fox who was guarding the hen house if the hens needed protecting…of course the answer from the fox was …no, of course not, I’ll let you know when they’re in danger…Such was the state of the burden on the prosecutors until recently. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:43 am
It was like asking the fox who was guarding the hen house if the hens needed protecting…of course the answer from the fox was …no, of course not, I’ll let you know when they’re in danger…Such was the state of the burden on the prosecutors until recently. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 5:30 am
The indeterminacy of these histories gives judges remarkably wide rein to craft the law as they see fit: “[W]hen it comes to Indian law,” the late Justice Scalia once quipped, “most of the time we’re just making it up. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 6:21 pm
And you have my word that when we’re through, there won’t be any more. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 3:30 am
According to the lawsuit, “[w]hen selecting the population of Facebook users who will receive employment ads, employers and employment agencies routinely focus their ads on prospective applicants who are in age bands that exclude many workers who are 40-years-old or greater, e.g., workers who are ‘ages 18 to 38,’ ‘ages 22 to 45,’ or ‘ages 21 to 55,’ thereby preventing older workers from receiving advertising and recruitment for job… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 5:48 am
Except for appellate opinions not approved for publication that have been reported in an authorized administrative law reporter, and except to the extent required by res judicata, collateral estoppel, the single controversy doctrine or any other similar principle of law, no unpublished opinion shall be cited by any court. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 11:45 pm
Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (Univ. of Cambridge - Law) has posted From TRIPS to FTAs and Back: Re-Conceptualising the Role of a Multilateral IP Framework in a TRIPS-Plus World (Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, forthcoming). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:22 pm
But the real mover this year was those Five Gold Rings: the cost of gold boosted the cost of the rings by a whopping 10%. 5 Gold Rings If you’re looking for a deal this year, you’re out of luck: None of the 12 items got any cheaper to buy. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
That’s the debate we’re having here. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 7:35 am
[W]hen I look at our inability to solve the housing crisis in places like San Francisco, New York, and Washington, D.C., I’m left feeling nothing but depression and hopelessness. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am
For Lawfare readers, this makes In re Vitamin C a case worth watching. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
" In re Transtexas Gas [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
" In re Transtexas Gas [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
Was the Court re-writing First Amendment law in this area, deliberately making it more difficult for plaintiffs to win? [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:06 am
At the same time, if you’re being ruled by emotion, then you’re not being fair and impartial. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:00 pm
“The FSA has thoroughly reviewed the scientific evidence about the safety of these eggs, and we’re confident that we can now change our advice to consumers. [read post]
