Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
Professor Orin Kerr is critical of White in this post at the Volokh Conspiracy, where he argues that, given the intensity with which teens use their phones to share information, “the odds are pretty good that a teenager who committed a robbery with . . . other people and who then confessed about the crime to [a family member] would have some evidence of the crime somewhere on the phone shortly after the crime occurred. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
Professor Orin Kerr is critical of White in this post at the Volokh Conspiracy, where he argues that, given the intensity with which teens use their phones to share information, “the odds are pretty good that a teenager who committed a robbery with . . . other people and who then confessed about the crime to [a family member] would have some evidence of the crime somewhere on the phone shortly after the crime occurred. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:38 pm
See In re Search Warrant, 71 A. 3d 1158 (Vt. 2012) (rejecting “any blanket prohibition on ex ante search warrant instructions”); see also In the Matter of a Warrant for All Content & Other Info. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:15 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has handed down a new case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 1:08 pm
No court we’re aware of has ever upheld an all persons warrant authorizing the search of even 100 people, let alone thousands. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:37 pm
(Courtesy of Orin Kerr) Leonard Garth was also remarkable for his passion about the law throughout his long life. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 5:29 am
We’re now past buying official assurances and believing. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 2:35 pm
Friends and family members maintain Scott was carrying a book—an assertion flatly denied by Kerr Putney, the police chief. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:37 am
For advice and counsel about workplace rules and Title VII’s impact on them, whether you’re an employer or an employee, contact the knowledgeable Georgia race discrimination attorneys at Mays & Kerr. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:59 pm
I think the DC Circuit’s dicta in In re Sealed Case is relevant here: If, moreover, the Government attempts to introduce at trial the Witness’ production of the companies’ records to prove the existence or authenticity of the documents or his possession or control of them, instead of introducing independent evidence to the same effect, then the Witness may presumably once again raise his Fifth Amendment privilege and contest whatever evidence the Government proffers to… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Threatening to re-hack accounts or hack additional accounts, Vallee terrorized his victims and repeatedly ignored their pleas for him to stop. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:17 am
That Kerr is such a trouble maker. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:05 am
They’re both about the underlying probable cause determination that the magistrate has to make when reviewing the warrant application based on the four corners of the affidavit. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:48 am
Students almost always start by addressing me as Professor Kerr, and I always ask to be called Orin. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 9:41 am
Whether you’re an employer or an employee, the hardworking Georgia FMLA attorneys at Mays & Kerr can help. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:07 am
If you’re fine with students calling you by your first name, that’s great. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
If I’m reading it correctly, it says that if you tell people not to visit your website, and they do it anyway knowing you disapprove, they’re committing a federal crime of accessing your computer without authorization. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale each gave separate dissenting judgments. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
But at least these arguments are sound in traditional exigent circumstances analysis, so they’re pretty fact-bound points. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
In my opinion, I cited Lady Hale in 2008, talking about totalitarian societies (for those following closely, my apologies that that citation in the linked opinion is to the wrong case of Re: B!). [read post]
