Search for: "In Re Presentment to Superior Court" Results 301 - 320 of 2,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2009, 7:11 am
  See In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-1680, 2008 U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:07 am
  The court disagreed and found that (i) the actuarially based estimated payout of the insureds’ present and future claims did not substantially impair their contract rights; and (ii) even if they were substantially impaired, any such impairment would be justified by a legitimate public purpose achieved through reasonable and necessary means. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
As such, the district court denied the carrier’s motion to dismiss without prejudice to the carrier’s right to re-raise the matter should the Pennsylvania Supreme Court take up the issue and reverse the Superior Court decision in Rush.On the heels of the Western District Court decision in Johnson, came the decision of U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Thomas J. McSweeney
The justices of the king’s courts only really enter this historical record when they have reason to, usually when they’re encountering the administrative institutions of either the Church or the Crown, which kept written records. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:18 pm by Unknown
"Estate of Ramin Bral, Los Angeles County Superior Court case #B323383 [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 12:20 pm
"It would become impossible for us to do the job of the court if our staff is reduced," Superior Court Judge Jeffrey R. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by K.O. Herston
Related articles Chattanooga Termination of Parental Rights Reversed in 2-1 Decision for Evidentiary Error: In re Johnny K.F. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
Superior Court, 151 Cal.App.3d 491, 198 Cal.Rptr. 829 (1984) and Cedars-Sinai Med. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  The court cited to the federal case of In re Adelphia Communications, No. 02-1781, 2003 WL 22358819 (E.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:06 am by Zoe Tillman
In a twist on usual appeals court proceedings in criminal cases, the government, not the defense, appealed District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Thomas Motley's ruling that such evidence would be unfairly prejudicial and was, as a result, inadmissible. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Hastings Law School, who attended the Gentry argument yesterday and wrote up this detailed report: Kelly Chen's Notes Re: Gentry Oral ArgumentCalifornia Supreme Court Case No. [read post]