Search for: "In Re Seats, Inc"
Results 301 - 320
of 559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Because any of these types of conflict involve hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people, all of the interested individuals cannot possibly participate in negotiating solutions to the problem at hand.In complex disputes involving hundreds of stakeholders (or more), it is virtually impossible to create a seat at the [negotiating] table for everyone. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:25 am
See, e.g., In re United Serv. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 12:22 pm
Under the second contract,Tantalam Technology Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
She re-tweeted: `that is ridiculous! [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:12 am
Moyano offers little analysis under either prong, but does rely on the NMB’s analysis in In re Empire Auto Center, Inc., 33 NMB 3, 2005 WL 3089356 (Oct. 13, 2005). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
He has so far yet to put metaphorical pen to electronic paper to record any thoughts in response to the recent UK Supreme Court decision Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 concerning res judicata (blogged by the IPKat here). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
More back-seat drivers for the major legal publishers. [read post]
5 May 2013, 1:56 pm
Agency, Inc.) [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Phillips (March 8, 2013) and In re Stephens (March 8, 2013) • In re Advanced Equities, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Phillips (March 8, 2013) and In re Stephens (March 8, 2013) • In re Advanced Equities, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:55 pm
“We’re only going downtown, do I have to? [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
In re Viterra Inc.., 101 U.S.P.Q.2d 1905 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
Meanwhile, the Kats are pondering on the move of Nils Wahl into the AG's hot seat. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 10:42 am
In In re Curtis, 354 F.3d 1347 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 12:49 pm
“We’re handling the nomination according to the law and our company’s by-laws. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 8:18 am
Legal Newsline reports: “Texas SC orders judge to clarify why he disregarded verdict” about IN RE UNITED SCAFFOLDING, INC., No. 10-0526 The Texas Tribune writes: “Texas Sees Rising Tide of Property-Rights Cases”, which while discussing larger trends, mentions “four decisions on land-use issues” from August 31, as well as TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
AS APPLIED TO THE DEFENDANTS IN THESE CASES, SALT LAKE CITY’S ORDINANCES RE PARK CURFEW AND DISORDERLY CONDUCT VIOLATE THEIR FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS AS PROTECTED BY THE UTAH CONSTITUTION. [read post]
