Search for: "In The Interest Of Donald S" Results 301 - 320 of 7,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Even though they are very good at playing devil’s advocate with the lawyers standing before them, their questions often signal which issues they are most interested in. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:16 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, the latter giving him a National Medal of the Arts in 2021. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:44 am by Dan Bressler
Jean Carroll judge” — “Former President Donald Trump’s attorney Alina Habba on Tuesday backed off of a conflict of interest claim against the judge who presided over the E. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
Indeed, it is precisely Donald Trump's efforts to upend lawful democratic electoral choice under the Constitution that constitute the gravamen of Trump's disqualification by Section Three. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[An interesting analysis of the former President's brief challenging his disqualification from the ballot in Colorado.] [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Although Section 3 lay dormant for much of its history, there was renewed interest in it after the Jan. 6 attacks on the Capitol. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  I will not go into the details here (which had to do with Democrats and Medicare), but interested readers can find a short contemporaneous criticism here.Similarly, I have occasionally mentioned a 2013 fact-check regarding a Republican claim that the US tax litigation system has a presumption that the government's position is correct -- that is, that Americans are supposedly treated as guilty until proven innocent, just like in France!! [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  I also flag below one important question the parties have failed even to address, about what Colorado law authorizes or requires officials to do with Donald Trump's name on the general election ballot after the Republican Party nominates him for President. 1. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ex-IRS Contractor Who Leaked Trump’s Tax Returns Sentenced to 5 Years MSN – Salvador Rizzo (Washington Post) | Published: 1/29/2024 A former government contractor who leaked confidential tax records filed by the wealthiest Americans, including those of Donald Trump was sentenced to the maximum of five years in prison. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Will Baude
  The article (and its thesis) immediately attracted wide interest:  For an academic article, The Sweep and Force of Section Three has provoked an unusual amount of interest and attention. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am by jonathanturley
While the media has endlessly covered how Donald Trump’s arguments are over-the-top in issues such as immunity, there appears to be comparably little interest in the president’s son’s self-aggrandizing demand for dismissal of his criminal charges. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
    In 2018, following the shooting at a Las Vegas music festival which left 58 people dead, President Donald Trump ordered the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) to ban bump stocks, the accessory which helped make the shooting the deadliest in modern American history. [read post]
” Courts have spent decades balancing the interests of copyright holders and the interests of the creative community to encourage the production of arts. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Nevertheless, the matter has become the subject of intense public interest. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Anderson, the case involving Donald Trump's potential disqualification under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
United States Former President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay writer, E Jean Carroll, $83.3 million in her defamation claim against him. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  In particular, Trump signed a Statement of Interest form in which he “affirm[ed]” that he “meet[s] all qualifications for the office prescribed by law,” which means that he has attested that, in his view, the Fourteenth Amendment does not bar him from holding the office. [read post]