Search for: "In re: Asbesto Products" Results 301 - 320 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
What Happened: Thorpe Insulation Company, along with its debtor-affiliate Pacific Insulation Company, distributed, installed, and repaired asbestos insulation products throughout the middle of the twentieth century. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
Given that its root cause is airborne exposure to asbestos, which used to be contained in thousands of everyday products in regular use by average Americans, its reach appears to know almost no bounds. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:32 am
Environmental Protection Agency had issued regulations that would have completely phased out the use of asbestos in all products made here. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm
With these jaw-dropping statistics at hand, one is left to wonder ...why do we continue to import and use asbestos containing products? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Bexis
  However, Bugosh was an asbestos case and the only appellants were intermediate sellers ? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:55 pm by David Oliver
Thus, the opinion of plaintiff's expert "merely implied that there was some non-zero probability that [plaintiff] was exposed to asbestos from Ford's product, and that this resulted in some non-zero increase in her risk of contracting mesothelioma. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:56 pm by Bexis
  In In re Aredia & Zometa Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 2015791 (M.D. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:05 am by David Oliver
Attack the premises - they're made of clouds. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:15 am by Rantanen
Some were dangerous (lead paint and asbestos), some were ridiculous, and some were enduring. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am by Bexis
such as the asbestos-related issue in O’Neal can get their attention ? [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am by Bexis
Bexis doesn’t limit his product liability horizons to drugs and devices ? [read post]
20 May 2012, 4:13 pm
If you're a Republican, you're an idiot not to support tort "reform. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Epstein recited the Selikoff multiplicative “synergy” theory, with relative risks of 5 (for non-smoking asbestos workers), 10 (for smoking non-asbestos workers), and 50 (for smoking asbestos-exposed workers). [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
The Court noted that frequently in mass tort and asbestos cases future claims have been dealt with by the appointment of a claims representative. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Normally bankruptcy does not expand pre-petition contracts or impose different risks on contracting parties, but it appears that when the courts are firmly convinced of the public good of creating an asbestos trust, insurance contracts at least can be re-written. 11 U.S.C §524(g) was added to the Bankruptcy Code after the historic Johns Manville asbestos bankruptcy case to codify the use of a trust and channeling injunction to allow asbestos defendants to… [read post]