Search for: "In re: Simmons " Results 301 - 320 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Re-wiring was not carried out for 6 months, during which time unsafe extension leads had to be used. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm by Giles Peaker
 Also good to see the unproblematic application of the Simmons v Castle uplift. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm by Giles Peaker
 Also good to see the unproblematic application of the Simmons v Castle uplift. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am by MBettman
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (the death penalty cannot be imposed for a crime committed as a juvenile.) [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
The reader who gets through this Article will know everything that we currently know about whether they “work,” by which I mean, chiefly, whether they reduce in-prison infractions or some measure of post-release recidivism, such as time to re-arrest, probability of re-arrest, or probability of reconviction. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
  In a capital case, “settlement” rarely occurs, but when it does, it typically results in moving a mentally ill inmate off of death row to another facility and re-sentencing him or her to life without the possibility of parole. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 11:20 am
In April 2013, the California Court of Appeal ruled in In re Marriage of Simmons, a case of first impression. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:22 am by John L. Welch
Miller, 105 USPQ2d 1615 (TTAB 2013) [precedential].Judge Seeherman, beginning with her concurrence in  In re Joint-Stock Company "Baik", has urged that more weight be given to the "rareness" factor, because the aim of Section 2(e)(4) should be to make sure that surnames are available for registration by others having that surname. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
At the IPKat's annual Intellectual Property Publishers and Editors lunch at Simmons & Simmons yesterday, this Kat heard an interesting statement from host and fellow Antipodean David Stone: ‘in Australia buffet lunches are like a competitive sport’. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:08 pm by Robichaud
  In a footnote, the Court of Appeal also points out that “Bill C-26, as yet to be proclaimed, significantly re-writes the statutory definition of self-defence. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:08 pm by Robichaud
  In a footnote, the Court of Appeal also points out that “Bill C-26, as yet to be proclaimed, significantly re-writes the statutory definition of self-defence. [read post]