Search for: "In re Amendment to Rule 39"
Results 301 - 320
of 757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
And, since plaintiffs' experts always seem to submit last-minute "amendments" to their reports in Daubert situations (whether they're permitted to or not), Dr. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
The ethics rules, King adds, should be interpreted based on potential consumer harm, and lawyer advertising rules should be narrowly tailored to avoid First Amendment violations. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. (2006) 38 Cal.4th 23, 39 ["The First Amendment protects the associational and expressive rights of persons - both lawyers and nonlawyers - to join together to employ litigation to seek redress of grievances. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
This court may not re-weigh the evidence nor substitute its inferences for those drawn by the jury. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
A petition for review with many grounds...In opposition proceedings, the patent was upheld with amended claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
A petition for review with many grounds...In opposition proceedings, the patent was upheld with amended claims. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The Civil Service Law of 1883[24]was amended to provide for “the appointment of the candidate standing highest on the eligible list certified by the responsible civil service commission. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The Civil Service Law of 1883[24]was amended to provide for “the appointment of the candidate standing highest on the eligible list certified by the responsible civil service commission. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:14 am
Dkt. 18 (Second Amended Complaint) (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Patent Nos. 8,017,375 ("the '375 patent") and 8,017,376 ("the '376 patent").As a first point, there was a ruling that Butamax did not infringe the claims. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:56 pm
Erwin (2017)39. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
Compared to Rule 506 offerings, Rule 144A transactions are fairly niche and, while I don’t have anything in the way of stats to back it up, I don’t think that we’re going to see any great shift toward Rule 144A offerings just because general solicitation and general advertising is permitted. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
” [via Tim Cone] Ex parte Carl Brad Ward; (In re: Carl Brad Ward v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
We write to make clear the view among experts in securities law that the Commission has statutory authority to promulgate disclosure rules in this area. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
(Trademark Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Pennsylvania Supreme Court overturns State anti-counterfeiting law: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Omar (IP Spotlight Precedential no. 39: TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of VOLTA for caffeine-laced vodka: In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc (TTABlog) Test your TTAB eye-ball ability on two triangle design marks for clothing: L.A. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
While no court has yet ruled on the issue, several commentators (and the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
§ 1334(b) and the Standing Order of Reference, Amended General Order No. 05‐02 (S.D. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
Sherman, 110 Haw. 39, 129 P.3d 543 (2006) (we analyzed that opinion here). [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am
" (39, citing Litton Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
But as long as we’re asking what “the Framers [did and] did not want,” let’s look at the odd drafting history of the Presidential Selection clauses and at the final approved language. [read post]
