Search for: "In re Charles B." Results 301 - 320 of 852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 12:04 pm by Charles Casper
This post was co-authored by Carla Graff, a summer associate with Montgomery McCracken and Charles B. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
The Ghost in the Machine As MTP readers will recall, a Silicon Valley lawyer named Renata B. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 4:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Chepiga 212-373-3421 gchepiga@paulweiss.com Charles E. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:11 am
Jacobs, Sidley Austin LLP, on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 Tags: Appraisal rights, Arbitrage, Buyouts, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL, Hedge funds, In re Appraisal of Dell,Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder voting, Transkaryotic Brexit: What Does the Vote Mean for Business? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Justice Scalia painted the unappealing prospect of having to re-sentence Henry Montgomery himself, now close to 70, for a crime he committed when he was 17, having to take the perspective of what he was like as a 17-year-old and whether life without parole would be appropriate, given what we knew about him then (rather than the accumulated knowledge that we have about [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
We think that the more they know, the better off we’re going to be. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:52 pm by Patrick Quinlan
Charles Grassley (R-IA), the current Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, in support of Judge Garland’s nomination. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:25 pm by Herb Lin
  They’re going to have to do better than that. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:19 am by Betty Lupinacci
T. (1970) [Charles Manson on the witness stand / B. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:40 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Januar 2015 auf: Es bestünden keine ernsthaften Anhaltspunkte dafür, dass der Privatkläger den fraglichen Retweet schon früher entdeckt habe, im übrigen handle es sich um einen Zweifelsfall, der untersucht gehöre (Erwägung 3.3 und Erwägung 5). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Each allegation forms anindependent basis for a new trial under Rule 60(b)(3).JJVC does not dispute that Dr. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 4:31 pm by Chris Castle
 Not at all–because you’re not a venture capitalist and you’re not as stupid as you look. [read post]