Search for: "Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed" Results 301 - 320 of 1,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Stuart Brooks, Olswang LLP
  On the other hand, the Court of Appeal sanctioned the High Court ruling in Samsung v Apple [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat) that an important feature of Apple’s design (also being filed in black and white line drawings [shown at Fig 3]) was a lack of surface decoration, which became an important differentiator between it and the alleged infringement. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
In Morse, he declared that Tinker was incorrectly decided. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:44 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
The material will stay offline unless the website user files a counter notification stating that the user believes the material was incorrectly removed. [read post]
1 May 2011, 1:14 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  That was the situation faced by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Canbar West Projects Ltd v. [read post]