Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks" Results 301 - 320 of 567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2015, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
The lower court failed to consider all of the evidence in the record in granting the employer’s summary judgment motion, and impermissibly “credited the evidence of the employer—the party seeking summary judgment—and failed to properly acknowledge key evidence offered by the party opposing that motion,” the appeals court had found (Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s arguments in King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
 But how about trade marks, wonders Eleonora? [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
 Never too late 30 [week ending Sunday 25 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case T‑11/14 Grundig Multimedia… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Hospira v Genentech Mark 1, the AppealThe dispute between Hospira and Genentech in the UK courts is getting a little confusing. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
" to nutty nameOh-la-la, a French court has just stopped two French parents from naming their baby girl ‘Nutella’, after the famous Ferrero’s trade mark. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
As Darren explains, the Supreme Court of the USA has just weighed in on the same matter in the case of Teva v Sandoz.* Exodus 2.0: pirate sites and the seven seasJeremy gives the floor to Míchel Olmedo Cuevas, who seizes the moment when a brand-new Hollywood colossal is being launched to explain the brand-new enforcement measures that the recent Spanish reform provides to battle online copyright infringement.* Softly, softly: General Court no-hopes Pianissimo… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
 Thus, as Jacob LJ explained in Actavis v Merck at [75], such a claim "is not aimed at and does not touch the doctor - it is directed at the manufacturer. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 * BREAKING NEWS: someone wants to register 'Je suis Charlie' as a trade mark…and it is not Charlie Hebdo, explains Eleonora. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
  * Cross-litigation on BIODERMA: different perspectives in national and Community proceedings Valentina writes about some cross-litigation concerning the ‘BIODERMA’ marks. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
 There the Court found assistance from Lord Walker in the House of Lords decision in Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. [read post]