Search for: "Jane Doe V"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
John Doe and Jane Doe matter presided over by Mme Prothonotary Aronovitch concerning Teksavvy’s motion to be reimbursed by Voltage for its “reasonable costs in the event it had to release information” arising from Prothonotary Aalto’s order of February 20, 2014 which ordered that that:3. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
The Court of Appeals usually finds that these toll disparities are legal.The case is Janes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
In another case involving alleged off-duty misconduct, Jane Doe v New York City Department of Education, 2015 NY Slip Op 02433, it was undisputed that a teacher and a student had engaged in unlawful sexual intercourse after school hours. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Revelation of Plaintiff's Gambling Addiction Doesn't Justify Pseudonymity or Sealing
16 Oct 2020, 6:13 am
From Ball v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 2:53 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized question comes from Jane C. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:10 am
A cautionary tale, from Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:54 pm
Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:46 am
Thanks to Jane Lambert and her NIPC Law blog for drawing my attention to Jaguar Land Rover Ltd v Twisted Automotive Ltd [2018] EWHC 3536 (Ch) (20 December 2018) which is a judgment of Rose J in an appeal against the 15 May 2018 (O-289-18) decision of Ms Louise White acting for the Registrar of Trade Marks. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
Doe. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 6:14 am
Transgender Military Service and Judicial Deference: Judges Wilkins and Williams have it out in Jane Doe 2 v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:32 pm
Defendant: VARIOUS JOHN DOES, VARIOUS JANE DOES and XYZ COMPANY Case Number: 5:2008cv01293 Filed: March 17, 2008 Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court Amerispec, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:47 am
A few weeks ago, however, an Indiana federal court—in Shoun v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
In D'Alessandro v Carro ;2012 NY Slip Op 30529(U); February 29, 2012; Supreme Court, New York County ;Docket Number: 100135/2011 ; Judge: Emily Jane Goodman finds to the contrary. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:40 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Doe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
Its complaint does not precisely articulate which common law trademarks it has in mind, but does include the following in its statement of facts: “In-N-Out is…widely known for providing variations of its menu items to customize orders for providing an exceptional customer experience. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:22 pm
The terms of the settlement included a payment of $30,000 to Jane Doe. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm
In three recent posts, I've sharply criticized briefs filed by the Department of Justice--and by the Solicitor General, in particular--in the various iterations of the Hargan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 2:29 pm
On Wednesday, April 28, 2022, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Cummings v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
Appointing authority's final determination as whether or not to take disciplinary action against an employee controlsRosenblum v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board, 2009 NY Slip Op 31073(U), April 29, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 101121/09, Judge Jane S. [read post]
