Search for: "Jed S. Rakoff" Results 301 - 320 of 786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Morgan settlement [Daniel Fisher, Michael Greve, earlier here, here, and here] Judge Jed Rakoff: Why have no high level execs been prosecuted over financial crisis? [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
That may be the case for the legal costs that former Goldman director Rajat Gupta incurred in defending himself against insider trading allegations; as noted here, Judge Jed Rakoff ordered Gupta to repay his criminal defense fees as part of Gupta’s criminal sentencing for insider trading. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 2:01 pm by Joe Patrice
[FindLaw] * Business Insider has fired its CTO because… he’s a jerk. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:07 am by Gregory K. Bader
Debate about the old policy began about two years ago, when Judge Jed S. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 1:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   Special thanks to a loyal reader for providing me with a copy of Judge Rakoffs decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:44 am by Anushila Shaw
Though the court found that Gupta did not receive “one penny” in return for providing the information, he was convicted and ultimately sentenced by Judge Jed Rakoff to two years in prison and assessed a $5 million fine, a heavy penalty for his gratuitous generosity to his friend, Rajaratnam. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 11:54 am by Michael Lowe
Their attitude is explained in a 1980 law review article in an often-cited quote by a former federal fraud prosecutor, Jed Rakoff: “To federal prosecutors of white collar crime, the mail fraud statute is our Stradivarius, our Colt .45, our Louisville Slugger, our Cuisinart–and our true love. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
A copy of Judge Rakoffs July 9 opinion can be found here. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The SEC’s New Policy to Require Liability Admissions in Certain Cases: Following on Judge Jed Rakoffs concerns in the Citigroup SEC enforcement action in connection with the proposed settlement that the company had neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing, the SEC, under new leadership, has reconsidered its longstanding policy and now will no longer allow defendants to settle cases without also admitting liability. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by David Keenan
District Judge Jed Rakoff, who in November 2011 would not approve a $285 million settlement between the SEC and Citigroup in which Citigroup did not admit liability. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:22 pm by A. Brian Albritton
District Court Judge Jed Rakoff dismissing the False Claims Act claims brought in a qui tam in which the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These kinds of settlements were first and most publicly attacked by Southern District of New York Judge Jed Rakoff, who, in a November 2011 order, questioned the SEC’s no admit settlement with Citigroup. [read post]