Search for: "John and Jane Doe Officers" Results 301 - 320 of 436
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The government, the defense complains, “does not even try to explain why the defense’s proposed remedy presents a unique or excessive burden” when it does more or less the same thing for other offices within DoD. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:13 am by Steve Hall
Twenty-seven years ago, Mary Jane Stout and her husband, Norman, allowed John David Stumpf and another man into their Guernsey County home to use the telephone. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Every judicial candidate says they want to be “fair” and “unbiased,” but unless you know them personally (or know someone who does) the only real information we have to go on is their professional experience. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
BUSHMAN, Attorney at Law, JANET CALLAGHAN, EILEEN DEGREGORIO, STEVI BROOKS NICHOLS, JEFFREY LEVITT, ESQ., Attorney at Law, HERBERT MONTE LEVY, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF HERBERT MONTE LEVY, ESQ., JOHN DOE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JOHN DOE, ESQ., JANE DOE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JANE DOE, ESQ  the end of years of litigation appears. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Julian Ouellet
Charter does allow for active military intervention under Chapter VII of the Charter, the ordering of processes in Chapter VII clearly favors negotiation as a first step. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Julian Ouellet
Charter does allow for active military intervention under Chapter VII of the Charter, the ordering of processes in Chapter VII clearly favors negotiation as a first step. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm by David Lat
Ray IIISpeaking of pro se litigants, let’s now turn to John H. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:45 am by Jack Goldsmith
The Washington Post reports that the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel wrote a classified legal opinion in support of the al-Aulaqi killing. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am by Adam Wagner
The police can arrest any trespasser who does not leave. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Woodworth v Janes, 2 Johns Cas 417, 423 [NY 1801] [parties in equal fault have no rights in equity]; Sebring v Rathbun, 1 Johns Cas 331, 332 [NY 1800] [where both parties are equally culpable, courts will not "interpose in favor of either"]). [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
John performed with Laurie on Laurie's album. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3p9d9yn (Chris Dale) How to Choose an eDiscovery Tool and eDiscovery Vendor - http://tinyurl.com/3e6jy35 (Dera Nevin) Jane Doe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:23 am by Legal Beagle
Jane Irvine, SLCC Chair, confirmed that Rosemary Agnew, the SLCC Head of Investigations, will continue in her role as Accountable Officer and Acting Chief Executive until further notice. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Nor were the John and Jane Doe defendants enough to give the new defendants adequate notice, because they were too vaguely described to provide adequate notice to the actual defendants that they were being sued. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:13 am by admin
But what if John Doe made a Promissory Note to Jane Doe that was payable on demand? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by Michael Froomkin
In addition to the committee members, there were about 45 people in the audience, about half of whom, I was told, were either from DHS or from privacy offices in other agencies.The first item on the agenda was an address by Jane Holl Lute, the Deputy Secretary of the DHS, who spoke about International Information Sharing Programs — ie data sharing with the EU over PNR. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:30 am by Christopher Ariano
When they came to my office, John and Jane had maxed out their credit cards, spent down their retirement and college savings accounts, and were at risk of losing their home and two cars. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:14 am by admin
 John Doe only got a $1,500.00 bond and Jane Doe got out after paying $2,500, why is my relatives bond going to be higher? [read post]