Search for: "Jonathan May"
Results 301 - 320
of 9,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
This Court may review some of them. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
Here, Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell made some striking concessions. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
(I may write more when the transcript is released.) [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You will be hearing arguments from: Jonathan Mitchell, who is representing Trump. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 12:58 pm
Navarro, Jonathan P. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
[The case raises an issue of high importance and the opinion may contain some loose reasoning.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:17 am
The MEPs seem to be motivated by concerns that patents may limit breeder´s and farmer´s access to these novel plant materials. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:52 pm
Constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley said impeachment is not to be used for being “a bad Cabinet member. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
I would like to thank Sarah and Jonathan for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Perhaps defendants in national proceedings may still challenge the jurisdiction of national courts to hear cases based on the proper interpretation of the transitional provisions in the UPC Agreement. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
" May 26, 2021. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
New York: The New York State Appellate Division, Second Department, finds that manual laborers who are paid in full bi-weekly, rather than weekly as required by state law, do not have a private right of action for underpayment of wages under the labor law and may not seek liquidated damages. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Before I address this argument, it’s important to note that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell appears to have abandoned two other insurrection-related arguments that Trump made in the Colorado courts: (i) that the violence at the Capitol on January 6 did not constitute an “insurrection” at all; and (ii) that inciting or aiding an insurrection doesn’t constitute “engaging in” it. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
The actions she takes may resemble the substantive act of counting. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
These papers were first presented at a Stanford Constitutional Law Center conference, organized by Michael McConnell and Jed Shugerman, in May 2022. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
" Moreover, while Trump has not leaned into the election law questions, Muller suggests that election law doctrines may offer more support for Trump's position (at least in the posture in which Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Trump is represented in the Supreme Court by Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of Texas’s controversial six-week abortion ban. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Democratic Groups File Complaints in an Attempt to Find Out MSN – Brian Slodysko and Jonathan Cooper (Associated Press) | Published: 1/24/2024 For months, the centrist group No Labels has stockpiled cash and diligently worked to secure ballot access for a potential third-party presidential bid, striking fear among allies of President Biden that the effort could siphon away votes and hand the White House to Donald Trump. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:43 am
" These later remarks may well provoke some interesting discussion about the obligations of Supreme Court advocates. [read post]
