Search for: "Jones v. York" Results 301 - 320 of 1,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
Tony Mauro of the BLT and Ashby Jones of the WSJ Law Blog both previewed Monday’s oral argument in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
McElveen, of Jones Day, contributed this guest post, for which we thank him. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:41 pm
This is the question that preoccupied Justice Kennedy in yesterday's oral argument in Jones v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiralty CRAB Qualifies as 'Vessel'; Damages Can Be Sought Under Jones Act for Injuries During Beach Project Lee v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Anna Christensen
Chicago and Cooper Industries v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
Irby and City of New York v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Lefkowitz, the text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester,* is set out below:  DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Lefkowitz, the text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester,* is set out below:  DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was  unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_01735.htmThe Cunningham… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:25 am
Apparently, the New York County Supreme Court and the Appellate Division, First Department, had some different perspectives on that issue.In the case of People v. [read post]