Search for: "Kind v. Clark" Results 301 - 320 of 489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander and one–time U.S. presidential candidate, General Wesley Clark, believes that cyber war exemplifies the tendency for technology to be “ahead of the law” (Adhikari, 2009). [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:01 am by Tim Sitzmann
(Imagine your grandchildren asking incredulously, “You mean the Volkswagen ‘V’ used to mean peace? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
In 64-year-old Clark’s case, it should have been made additionally clear to him that, although his only current symptom is age-appropriate memory loss, that investigators might come to suspect that this is a symptom of a neurodegenerative condition rather than normal aging. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
ABC do seem differ is the kind of factual evidence involved. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:01 pm by PaulKostro
It must be similar in kind and reasonably close in time to the offense charged; 3. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:28 am
" The kind of question every lawyer loves... [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
One or more words that might reasonably be required by a competitor to describe similar goods/service cannot be such a badge.I'm going to be lazy here and simply paste in the relevant section of Clark Equipment Co v Registrar of Trade Marks [(1964) 111 CLR 51, in which Kitto J said:"In Registrar of Trade Marks v W. and G. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
  A split of this kind is highly unusual – the most recent example that we are aware of is the case of Sheldrake v DPP [2003] EWHC 273 (Admin) in October 2002 where Latham LJ and McCombe J were unable to agree and directed a hearing before a three judge court which took place 4 months later before Clarke LJ and Henriques and Jack JJ who reached a 2:1 decision (which was itself subsequently overturned by the House of Lords). [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the in camera application, Laffoy J referred to Clarke J’s judgment in Doe v Revenue Commissioners and held the Court has no jurisdiction to hear these civil proceedings otherwise than in public. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Exhibit A of this phenomenon in Tuerkheimer‘s article is the initial Sixth Circuit opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:09 pm by Bill
He was backed by his son, George V, and was genial and enthusiastic. [read post]