Search for: "LEON v. UNITED STATES"
Results 301 - 320
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
Instead, EFF and the ACLU point to a series of recent key decisions—including the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
United States law uses the exclusionary ruleto enforce the requirements of the 4th Amendment, which means evidence obtained by actions that violate the 4th Amendment cannot be used against the person whose property was searched in a criminal prosecution unless. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
United States, __ U.S. __, 131 S.Ct. 2419 (2011). [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
The Section 215 telephony-metadata program serves the paramount government interest in preventing and disrupting terrorist attacks on the United States, a compelling special governmental need. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:40 am
In the second case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
United States), parties can seek to reopen cases, etc. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
” Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Michal Freedman, and Leon Gordis, Reference Guide on Epidemiology 549, 617 & n.211, in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (3ed ed. 2011)[RMSE]. 2. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
In their landmark 2008 case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
United States, 636 F. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am
Nonetheless, the court concluded that the district court did not commit a reversible error where the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:32 pm
The key reasoning of the new decision, United States v. [read post]
