Search for: "LJ" Results 301 - 320 of 2,404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am by Léon Dijkman
Floyd LJ stated: First, and most importantly, Neurim and Flynn have, and have provided to the court, reasonably detailed forecasts of their expected sales revenues in Periods 1 and 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
Floyd LJ’s judgment (with which Arnold LJ and Males LJ agreed) starts, as would be expected, with a summary of the background and timetable. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am by Giles Peaker
This got fairly short shrift from Patten LJ’s lead judgment. [read post]
This is in itself an interesting point which may perhaps be contrasted with the observations of Floyd LJ in FujiFilm v Abbvie [2017] at paragraphs 113-116 that the absence of an exclusive licence to an entity which exploited the invention in the UK might place difficulties in the way of obtaining an interim injunction. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm by Giles Peaker
” The High Court agreed with Ms K It is “fundamental” that a “forfeiture provision should bring the lease to an end earlier than the “natural” termination date” (Clays Lane Housing Co-operative Ltd v Patrick at 194, per Fox LJ). [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:58 am by steve cornforth blog
Coulson LJ relied on the decision of HHJ Graham Wood QC in Olesiej v Maple Industries which concerned a related argument over the recovery of translators fees. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:57 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Akebia: Arnold LJ addresses insufficiency, equivalence, second medical use claims, and much more | An unimpressed LJ Floyd strikes out Regen Lab's UK appeal (Regen v Estar) | No European qualifying examination will be held in 2020 says EQE Supervisory Board | [Guest Post]: Insights on pharmaceuticals patents and Covid-19 from an Italian perspective | Is there any connection between unlawful competition founded on trademark infringement in South Africa and the press… [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:15 am by Giles Peaker
Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd (2020) UKSC 18 The issue before the Supreme Court was whether “the landlord of a block of flats is entitled, without breach of covenant, to grant a licence to a lessee to carry out work which, but for the licence, would breach a covenant in the lease of his or her flat, where the leases of the other flats require the landlord to enforce such covenants at the request and cost of any one of the other lessees”. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am by Giles Peaker
Moreover, to paraphrase Atkin LJ, the doors had been made part of the flat itself in the course of its construction. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am by Sophie Corke
PatentsGuestKat Léon Dijkman provided an index of some of the most interesting issues in Arnold LJ's wide-ranging FibroGen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:24 am by Alex Woolgar
But a brief judgment from Arnold LJ [yes, you read correctly - a succinct 62 paragraphs] contains some further catnip for the interested reader...Key pointsThe original plan was for oral argument at a hearing on 2 April 2020, but this planned hearing was replaced with written submissions (for relatively obvious reasons).Unsurprisingly (in light of the CJEU's judgment), SkyKick's invalidity counterclaim in relation to (lack of) clarity and precision was dismissed in short order. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:31 am by Rose Hughes
Regen versus Estar was one of the key decisions of the High Court last year (Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC 63 (Pat), IPKat here). [read post]