Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley" Results 301 - 320 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2010, 3:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Separately, see Silence in a reference can sometimes be anticipation including discussion ofUpsher-Smith Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:50 am
In litigation, the '647 patent survived an invalidity challenge-->Abbott Labs. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:03 am by Dennis Crouch
Mark Lemley and Colleen Chien wrote on this topic in a 2011 NYTimes Editorial: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/opinion/patents-smartphones-and-the-public-interest.html     [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:09 am
Later on in the post, IPBiz alluded to a previous event, in which Mullin pushed some thoughts from Mark Lemley about how most patent infringement suits do not involve allegations of "copying. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 10:57 pm
" Looking at the amicus briefs in KSR v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:09 pm
Look at a case from Australia called Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:23 am by Dennis Crouch
See also, Mark Lemley, The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights, 61 Stan. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark Lemley: Trademarks do serve competition, specifically by reducing search costs. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 2 – Copyright Enforcement: Faye Fangfei Wang, Resolving Copyright-related Cases Over the Internet with the Assistance of Artificial  Intelligence in Europe Automated notice and takedown/Content ID with appeal mechanism as an example of how the new European rules are supposed to work. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: very easy to say that money changes everything. [read post]