Search for: "Lord v. U.s"
Results 301 - 320
of 644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
Surveillance Royal assent to the Investigatory Powers Bill, or Snoopers’ Charter, is imminent now that it has passed through the final stages at the House of Lords. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Passing OffGuestKat Alex Woolgar summarised the short but sweet judgment from Lord Justice Floyd in Media Agency Group Limited and Transport Media Limited v Space Media Agency Limited and Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 712 that overturned a rather generous first instance finding of passing off through cybersquatting.Publications and General MattersAnnsley Merelle Ward provided a nice write-up in anticipation of a new IBIL publication entitled The Sir… [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 11:28 am
The U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1876); Tenet v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
In the role of chief justice, Alito seemed quite comfortable with his opening declaration, as if he might enjoy one day being the real one: “We will hear argument in the case of Lord and Lady Montague, Lord and Lady Capulet v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:40 am
The Court found it simpler to reach that conclusion because of a 1983 House of Lords decision, Mandla v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm
French Court Agrees with U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
She said that much could be learned from the U.S. example, where President Obama has said that IP is the U.S.'s single most important asset and as a result IP features in almost all of the US trade missions. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
She said that much could be learned from the U.S. example, where President Obama has said that IP is the U.S.'s single most important asset and as a result IP features in almost all of the US trade missions. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:26 am
V. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
The Court of Appeal disagreed: Airbus v Patel [1997] 2 Lloyds Rep 8; but then the House of Lords agreed with Colman J, holding in effect that the English courts should not act as the world's policemen where a non-contractual anti-suit injunction was sought, as this would be contrary to the principle of comity: Airbus v Patel [1999] 1 AC 119. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
The Committee stage of the Data Protection Bill continued on Monday 6 November 2017 in the House of Lords and will resume on 13 November 2017. [read post]
