Search for: "M/V LORD" Results 301 - 320 of 915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
I’m afraid I’m going to gush about one and be a little bit hard on the other. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
I'm sure readers will have an opinion... [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am by Bill
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
" ICS v West Bromwich (per Lord Hoffmann).So it's not what you, your client or the other side think or wished it means. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by familoo
But I’m not daft enough to go down that particular rabbit hole in this blog post. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:21 am by Aimee Denholm
Handing down the judgment, the Lord Chief Justice (Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd) , Master of the Rolls (Sir Terence Etherton) and Lord Justice Sales, have found that the Government is not entitled to give notice of a decision to leave the EU under Article 50 by exercise of the prerogative powers of the Crown and without reference to Parliament. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
In the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:42 am
I've got "bear" in mind today, because I'm teaching District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 6:51 pm by Mark Tushnet
(I once had Joshua Locke, the student denied a scholarship in Locke v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
Under s.21, National Assistance Act 1948 both the House of Lords and the Supreme Court had held that a need for accommodation was not sufficient to engage the duty; the duty to provide accommodation only arose if the need for care and attention, which was a need to be looked after, was for services that were not otherwise available unless residential accommodation was provided: M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 and R (SL) v Westminster CC [2013] UKSC 27. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Bill is currently going through the House of Lords where new amendments are being debated. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week the Daily Mail published a clarification about the article which said: “An article published on May 26 described Lord Sugar as a ‘spiv’. [read post]