Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 301 - 320
of 20,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 12:32 pm
As a practical matter, they're hard to write. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the knowledge of the method and the conditions for determining the parameter is required for the parameter to be unambiguously defined (see T 412/02 [5.8-9]). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
UK has a closed list of subject matter; you can’t protect something that isn’t on the list. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
Says Professor Schondelmeyer: If the generic doesn’t have the exact bioavailability profile—meaning the drug is absorbed at a faster or slower pace into the bloodstream—then it will be B rated … Dr. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:49 am
Thus, it doesn’t matter if Rules 373 and 12(b)(3) might permit proof of mailing by a legible postmark, since plaintiff didn’t have one – the APC label indicated that the plaintiff might have mailed his envelope on April 3, but nothing more. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The ED denied the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 over the disclosure in document D1, a document relevant under A 54(3). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:49 am
SB Yen Mgm’t. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Don’t wait until it’s too late: Contact the Law Office of Robert B. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Guido Calabresi advanced a theory of statutory desuetude under which courts would sometimes be able to take such a measure, but I don't think §2G2.2(b)(6) fits Calabresi's theory, which, in any event, has never been endorsed by anyone other than Calabresi. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the Board came to the conclusion that the technical activity of step A did not interact with the mental activities of steps B to E to lead to a tangible technical result and therefore had to be ignored in the assessment of inventive step. [12] The Board considers that the present case clearly differs from the case underlying decision T 784/06. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The same conclusion was laterreached in decisions T 666/055 and T 1213/05.612. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:33 pm
That is WHAT TRULY MATTERS!!! [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
The core decision where this follows from is this decision, T 1329/04. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:27 pm
How do I know the prosecution's motive doesn't matter? [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 2:18 pm
Yesterday's Court of Appeals decision in the case of In the Matter of T.B., and Charity B. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
What subject-matter is patentable? [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:53 am
The Board wasn’t convinced by Patentee’s arguments and found added matter based on several interesting legal points. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm
B. thinks not: she's betting it was Erwin's decision--that he doesn't wan't to be identified merely as Anna's husband. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:20 am
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedures § 528.07(b) (“[T]he Board may deem the pleadings to have been amended, by agreement of the parties, to allege the matter. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
I think it's abundantly clear that there's no controlling California Supreme Court precedent that governs the issue as to whether California requires the (b)(3) prerequisites to be met even in (b)(2) -- or, for that matter, (b)(1) -- cases.So there's flexibility there.And there's substantial reason to make the rules different. [read post]
