Search for: "MATTER OF T S D" Results 301 - 320 of 34,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2020, 7:14 am by Eric Turkewitz
It doesn’t matter if it’s a car crash or medical malpractice. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:10 am by Diane Polscer
LEXIS 61848 (June 22, 2010), the Oregon District Court denied the insurer’s motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial, following a $941,268.00 verdict in a first-party collapse case. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(a) In decision T 19/86, a new group of subjects (sero-positive piglets) was vaccinated against the same disease (Aujeszky’s disease) against which vaccination had already been disclosed for sero-negative piglets. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It therefore provides the means to stop applicants, in reply to the first communication, dropping existing claims, replacing them by switching to unsearched and non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description, i.e., claiming different subject-matter in sequence rather than simultaneously (T 274/03 [4], T 915/03 [3], T 1285/11 [2]). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:48 pm by Jeff Gamso
No, in one sense it doesn't matter what you call it. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
As the AD2 noted, “Under the circumstances of this case, the father's noncompliance with the court's directives prevented the matter from proceeding to a best interests hearing. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
As noted elsewhere, Joe Biden's big plagiarism issue wasn't cribbing from Kinnock; it was the copying in law school. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:34 pm by Chad Oldfather
  Having given the matter a full ten minutes’ worth of thought (that’s how one does it in the Internet age, right?) [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:04 am by David
 Rule 4.2 in most states prohibits, without consent of opposing counsel, communications about a matter with a person represented by counsel in that matter. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am by Rose Hughes
 T 1989/18 and T 1024/18 by contrast relate to the legal basis for deletion of contradictory subject matter. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:30 am by Norm Pattis
If you think that trial experience doesn't matter for a Supreme Court justice, I urge you to read Justice Sonya Sotomayor's dissent in Skilling v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:14 pm
So far I'd say blogs haven't made much of a difference. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
Reference in this regard was made to decision T 613/10 (see the decision under appeal, reasons 3.1).2.3 The opposition division concluded that the requirements of Rule 76(2)(c) EPC were not met (see reasons 4).The board's position3. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:04 am by Matt Osenga
  She strongly criticizes the majority for disregarding the Supreme Court’s decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
-amylase according (a-d) wherein the ? [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 1:15 pm by Gene Quinn
Despite the best efforts of Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), efforts to reform America’s patent system for the better have stalled to the point that the Senate IP Subcommittee is moving on from patent matters and will focus on copyright reform throughout 2020. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:09 pm
I can't for the life of me understand why they didn't just let Nordli be Nordli and finish her lady's life with all the range and subtlety she had displayed all along.Besides the leads, there is surprisingly little in Macbeth that you really remember. [read post]