Search for: "MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHNSON T"
Results 301 - 320
of 494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
Instead of coverage breadth, what matters is whether the plaintiff was an employee — “the undisputed evidence does establish as a matter of law that the City controlled the details of Johnson’s work and, thus, that Johnson was its employee. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:03 pm
The employer filed a petition for review of the second and third reconsideration orders, which was consolidated with its petition for review for all purposes. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:59 am
Unfortunately, the petitions to recall Second Ward Council Member Robert Jenkins, Third Ward Council Member John Valdivia, Fifth Ward Council Member Chas Kelley, Sixth Ward Council Member and Mayoral Candidate Rikke Van Johnson and Seventh Ward Council Member Wendy McCammack were unavailable. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
On July 16, 2012, the Honorable Sterling Johnson referred the matter to a Magistrate to hold an evidentiary hearing and issue a Report and Recommendation. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Good thing they weren’t headed to Kim Jong-un’s poker tourney. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
The Proposition 8 defenders nominally defend that outcome on page 28 of their brief (because the “natural capacity to create children . . . as a matter of indisputable biological fact is limited to sexual relationships between a man and a woman . . . the traditional definition of marriage satisfies the Equal Protection Clause under any standard of review, for even when heightened scrutiny applies, ‘[t]he Constitution requires that [a State] treat similarly… [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:39 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s reasoning on this matter isn’t clear, given the conflicting treatment of statutes of limitation, and the opinion as a whole has questionable continuing validity, given the Eleventh Circuit’s reasoning in Witko. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
But as a practical matter, the odds of Supreme Court review have less to do with the question presented than the fact that it’s a state petition seeking review of a judgment involving Ninth Circuit Judges Reinhardt and Fletcher. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
If you never made a statement to the police, then it will not matter whether you were told of your right to remain silent. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
A Johnson County judge conducted a separate ceremony August 19, 2009. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
” Its concluding footnote observes that, given the public concern reflected in amicus briefs, “[t]his is a matter the Legislature could address. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:39 pm
To speak with an experienced lawyer who focuses exclusively on family law matters today, please do not hesitate to contact the Law Office of Sandy T. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:15 am
§ 161 : As the Supreme Court noted in Chakrabarty, “a new mineral discovered in the earth or a new plant found in the wild is not patentable subject matter. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Johnson, 142 Fla. 425, 194 So. 869, 872 (1940); Brittingham v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:32 pm
In Lichtenstein, the Court of Appeals adopted what it calls the "commonsense definition" of the word "accident", citing to the case of Johnson, a ca [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
To its credit, the government never advanced such a categorical and sweeping argument, probably because, inter alia, it suffers from three distinct—but equally fundamental—flaws: First, this argument, which is predicated on Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm
Johnson. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am
Perhaps the defendant in Beard preserved the issue, we don’t know, but that didn't matter since the defense cross-petition for alloca [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
The judgment in Johnson v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:01 am
web petition (be sure to go sign it if you haven't). [read post]
