Search for: "March v. Cross"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Attorney provided those billings to Upper Deck in March 2005. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:53 am
The Court also declined to hear a cross-petition by Jarkesy arguing that circuit courts lacked jurisdiction to remand his case back to the Commission (Jarkesy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
Appellant also argued that under Georgia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:18 am
The Court of Appeals vacates a Rule 12 dismissal in a discrimination case brought by a pro se plaintiff against an experienced law firm.The case is Friedman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:06 am
The events that eventually lead to the defendant being arrested began in March 2008. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
Superior Court (State of California) (March 4, 2010) ___ Cal. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
HOLT V. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
The lease was signed and recorded in March of 1995. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
(EJIL: Talk Blog, April 2024) [text]"Venezuelans increasingly stuck in Mexico, lowering illegal crossings to US," VOA News, 31 March 2024 [text]**Visit the weekly Americas Migration Brief for a much more extensive round-up of news and publications.Reports:Análisis regional de necesidades de ayuda legal: Colombia, México, Perú, Venezuela, Guatemala y Honduras (Danish Refugee Council, March 2024) [text via ReliefWeb]Declaración de la IX… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
These eleven Appellate Term, Second Department, New York no-fault decisions were decided on March 10 and posted on March 18, 2010. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
Appellant did not have the opportunity to cross-examine these potential witnesses. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
On March 11, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
ASRES Opinion of the Court – 3 – The trial court heard and received evidence from the parties on Defendant’s motion on 14 March 2017. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:00 pm
”) Since there was no evidence that the defendants acted improperly, or in violation of law, the Appellate Division, Second Department, concurred with the court below and affirmed the dismissal.They clearly didn't bless his absenteeism.# # #DECISIONR. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
Filed March 7, 2007--Opinion by Judge J. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 3:31 pm
By Brian Wolfman The day before yesterday, in Progressive West Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
March 9, 2009) (No. 07-10034) Before the former testimony of a witness who is unavailable may be introduced, the proponent must show that "the party against whom the testimony is now offered, or, in a civil action or proceeding, a predecessor in interest, had an opportunity and similar motive to develop the testimony by direct, cross, or redirect examination. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
For crossing an intersection when the "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing.Yet, notwithstanding the incredibly tiny monetary interest at stake, the opinion may well have more practical significance to most of us than nearly every single one of the other appellate opinions we read.Pamela Monk got her $25 ticket because a police officer saw her enter the crosswalk when the red "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing, and was in it's "countdown" mode; e.g.,… [read post]
