Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2021, 5:38 am
The results were clear: most executives say board performance is falling short of the mark. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:24 am
The PC recommended that the Government amend the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) to ensure that parallel imports of marked goods do not infringe an Australian registered trade mark when the marked good has been brought to market elsewhere by the owner/licensee of the mark. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
Likelihood of Dilution: The Board ruled that the term "famous mark" in Section 43(c)(2)(B) is applicable to a "famous family of marks. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:17 am
A mathematical discovery and a trade mark at once? [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
That second-wave scholarship, led by such luminaries as C. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 3:10 am
"[C]orn cakes and rice cakes are the species, not the genus. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:38 am
Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:21 am
Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
(Case C? [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
CentreVida Birth and Wellness Center c/o Faith Beltz and Family-Centered Midwifery c/o June Lamphier, FA0911001295573 (Nat. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:00 am
On 18 January 2024, in case C-367/21 (still no English version) the CJEU ruled again on the exhaustion of EU trade mark rights (following its five rulings of 17 November 2022 including C-175/21 Harman International Industries, C-224/20 Merck Sharp & Dohme, and C‑204/20 Bayer Intellectual Property). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
I mean . . . c’mon. [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:33 am
In re Lego Juris A/S, Serial Nos. 88698784 and 88698804 (May 9, 2022) [not precedential (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:45 am
Each of these three false marking offenses, however, must be shown to have been done “for the purpose of deceiving the public,” and not merely done as a result a good faith mistake. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
Lynch).The Goods and Services: The Board found that the goods overlap in part. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Blane In this video, attorney Mark C. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Since average consumers are not in the habit of making assumptions about the origin of products based on their shape or the shape of their packaging in the absence of any graphic or word element, it is more difficult to establish distinctive character in relation to 3D trade marks (C 456/01‑P, C 457/01, C 345/10‑P). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
The Board's recent JUST JESU IT and MOTOWN METAL decisions seemed to waken the Rip Van Winkle of TTAB jurisprudence - Section 43(c) dilution - from its long slumber. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:19 am
If you were busily digesting the Chocolate Bunny ruling earlier today, you might have missed a further trade mark ruling from the European Union's senior court: Case C? [read post]
