Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 301 - 320
of 34,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 8:03 am
"Presidio Components Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:15 am
The fame of the POST-IT mark was the dominant factor, with the Board rejecting applicant's principal argument that the marks are not confusingly similar. 3M Company v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 4:45 am
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm
Monster Cable Prods. and Monster Cable Int'l, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
In November 2019, the Board dismissed the appeal and found that there was a likelihood of confusion by considering, first, the average degree of visual and phonetic similarity of the marks at issue and, second, the identity of the goods in question.The Applicant subsequently appealed to the General Court.The General Court’s considerationsRelevant public and its level of attentionThe General Court confirmed the Board’s finding that the relevant public was the French public,… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:41 am
How A Bond Hearing Saved Me From Deportation By Mark Hwang Today the Supreme Court will hear Jennings v.... [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
The issue of whether IPRs (in that case, copyright) was moveable property within the contemplation of section 44 of the Nigerian Constitution came up as an issue in the case of Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited (MCSN) v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:35 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 3:26 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Kelyn Bacon QC) Red Bull GmbH v Big Horn UK Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 124 (Ch) (30 Jan 2020) This was a claim by Red Bull GmbH against Big Horn UK Ltd. and its sole director Lyubomir Enchev. for infringement of the following European trade marks: EU003629342, EU000052746 and EU001564301 Red Bull complained that the defendants had distributed a [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:49 am
Its name reflects the campus zip code.Among the documents it posted is Mark Zuckerberg's online personal diary. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:05 pm
Mark Spognardi In his article published September 16 on Inside Counsel’s website, Arnstein & Lehr Chicago Partner Mark A. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
The post Trademark parodies and iconic marks: can foul become fair? [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) issued its eagerly awaited decision in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:45 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:04 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Batson challenge This case returns to us for the third time, and on a very narrow question: whether the Circuit Court for Baltimore City was able, two years after the fact, to analyze the State’s rationale for striking an African-American juror during voir dire at Mark O’Neil’s trial. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 12:49 pm
Criminal procedure — Post-conviction relief — Abuse of discretion The State of Maryland, appellant, appeals the post-conviction order of the Circuit Court for Harford County that granted Mark Edmund Christian, II, appellee, a new trial. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
Criminal law — Illegal sentence — Merger of robbery convictions In 2014, Mark Kenneth Floyd, appellant, was sentenced by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to two 10-year terms of imprisonment, run consecutively, for two counts of robbery. [read post]
