Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice" Results 301 - 320 of 1,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 6:19 am by James Romoser
United States, a case pending at the Supreme Court involving the interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm by Wells Bennett
By way of reminder, this week’s pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on notice to parties before departing from sentencing guidelines)Wednesday, April 16No. 07-343: Kennedy v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:03 am
May 2, 2012): After the September 11, 2011 attacks on the United States, the government detained Jose Padilla, an American citizen, as an enemy combatant. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:20 pm by Benjamin Pollard
The United States repatriated Assadullah Haroon Gul, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, writes the New York Times. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
”   A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Victoria Clark
Elena Chachko made sense of Iran’s lawsuit against the United States in the International Court of Justice. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we consider whether the Justices should (or will) grant cert. in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
United States “may have opened up a big can of worms. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
”  After all, the Department of Justice and the grand jury have charged hundreds of individuals in connection with the January 6 attack on the Capitol—some even with “seditious conspiracy” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
In footage shot in 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit hears argument in Jewel, and an attorney from the Department of Justice tries to convince a skeptical court that it should simply decide not to decide the case, leaving it to the other branches of government. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]