Search for: "Marvelle v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
All others -- just shut up and keep your heads low.)What a despicable state of affairs. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
One can but marvel at the madness that drives megalomania. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
In this age, it is a marvel that there is such hostility to free expression of ideas. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am by David J. DePaolo
Though he didn't attend the meeting he was still paid for the two hours that the meeting would have taken because his former supervisor considered that he would not have been in the motorcycle accident but for the meeting.The workers' compensation judge, the Appeals Board and the 5th District all found compensability.In Kansas, the state Supreme Court sent a case back to the fact finding courts to determine if an employee who was injured in a go-kart accident was in the course and scope of… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
And what of the marvel of the mini-antennas? [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:35 pm by Michael Steven Green
Yet another un- or underexplored question about Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
  The jury disagreed and found that Marvell had willfully (although not explicitly stated in the verdict, see the excellent PatentlyO post here) infringed the patent much to the “gratification” of Carnegie Mellon (see press statement here). [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
One of the key pieces of evidence in the trial was an old email from a Seagate engineer noting that the CMU invention went well beyond the current state of the art. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
The Centre for Chinese and Comparative Law (RCCL) of the School of Law of City University of Hong Kong organised an marvelous International Conference on “Realisation of Socio-Economic Rights in Emerging Free Markets: Perspectives from China and India”. [read post]