Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 301 - 320
of 720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
Indeed, this outcome was clearly compelled by applicable precedent given the Court’s prior holding, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
Yet such regulation is clearly authorized, if not required, by the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:29 am
If EPA's press release is any indication of what it will say in its formal denial of the petition, it looks like it is going to bungle this as badly it did the petition at issue in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:35 pm
The Supreme Court relied on this case exactly 100 years later in upholding the right of states to sue for action under the Clean Air Act, in its 2007 global warming decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
In making that finding, the Fifth Circuit looked to Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
Standing was one of the issues (the only issue, if you ask me) in the Massachusetts v EPA case. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 2:36 am
Lawyers working for California Attorney General Jerry Brown told Climate Law Update the case would draw legal support from last year's landmark Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
(citing Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:30 am
In Climate Change Regulation and EPA Disincentives, Latin casts a disappointed eye on the Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts to address greenhouse gas emissions using its authority under the Clean Air Act in the aftermath of Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
In a 2018 case involving the federal Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), Rizo v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:08 pm
This authority includes GHGs, as confirmed in the Supreme Court’s 2007 opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:31 am
EPA, 292 F.3d 895, 899 (D.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:27 pm
” The Supreme Court ultimately hears the case of Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:59 am
As the Supreme Court has twice observed, first in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 10:23 pm
Prof. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm
Circuit and is entitled Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Overturn the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v EPA, holding that greenhouse gases (GHGs) constitute “air pollution” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act and that EPA has the duty to regulate it if the agency finds that GHG emissions endanger health and welfare; . [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
The original “train wreck” rhetoric came from former President Bush, to explain his refusal to carry out the Supreme Court’s landmark global warming decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:04 pm
Arguably, it also cannot be squared with the ruling last April of a sharply divided (5-4) Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
