Search for: "Matter of Burke" Results 301 - 320 of 1,014
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Discussion leaders: Kate Darling: attribution as something that people want rather than money in “negative spaces. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 4:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Within the post is the text:Normally, if an inventor believed he or she was left off a patent, he or she could raise the issue in the patent office or federal court and appeal to have it added, explained Dan Burk of the University of California, Irvine, School of Law. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Dan Burk: If I don’t buy Rawls and instead like Nash, do I have to buy your paper? [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:03 am by Quinta Jurecic
Sharon Burke will moderate an expert panel discussion following Secretary James' remarks. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 6:52 am by Bob Kraft
No matter how the car accident happened, you will have to follow some basic steps if you want to claim your insurance. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:27 am by SHG
Burk’s response was to refuse to acknowledge that ruckus he made because he didn’t care for the tone of those who disagreed with him. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 4:10 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But consider that the US requires (I think unwisely) three-quarters of the states to amend the Constitution or, for that matter, 2/3 of the Senate to ratify a treaty. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Justice Burke asked whether the time which passed between the plaintiff receiving the records and contacting the medical records reviewing firm was significant. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
  This case was the first time the matter had ever been contested by defense counsel. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Burke Niazi Solicitors Housing solicitor to join the team at the North London office in Islington. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:13 pm by Ilya Somin
Legal scholar Cassandra Burke Robertson has further relevant comments on the issue of the firm here (as well as other criticisms of Gonzales’ arguments). [read post]