Search for: "Matter of Gore v Gore" Results 301 - 320 of 687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
A jury found the ’135 patentvalid and that Gore willfully infringed, and, in December2010, the district court denied Gore’s motions for judgmentas a matter of law (“JMOL”) reversing the verdict.Gore appealed, and, in February 2012, the panel affirmed.Bard I, 670 F.3d at 1193. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:08 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Legal scholars believe the High Court will take up either the California or the Utah case.The case from California features two heavy-hitting lawyers: Ted Olson and David Boies of Bush v Gore 2000 fame; they have joined forces for this epic civil rights struggle. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Breaking: This morning, Judge Paule of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Breaking: This morning, Judge Pauley of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part (but mostly denying) the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
[i] Sometimes the patterns matter much more than the individual decisions, whether good or bad. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:48 pm by Ron Coleman
This is my issue, and it’s not solely a matter of whose ox is being gored, believe me — I have little use for eco-hippies and bicycling polar bears. [read post]