Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding (Doe)" Results 301 - 320 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
In any event, it appears that Mueller does not share Barr’s view that facially valid uses of Article II (whatever those are exactly) can never be treated as criminal. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am by Josh Blackman
For example, President Clinton perjured himself under oath during a grand jury investigation. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the 1993 Nixon case, Judge Nixon was a US District Judge in Mississippi who had been criminally convicted of making false statements before a federal grand jury and sentenced to prison. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In other words, if Goldsmith is right, it is lawful for the president to, say, walk into a grand jury and lie knowingly and intentionally and repeatedly as long as there’s some plausible argument, even an attenuated one, that the lies are intended to protect, say, a secret diplomatic initiative. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:19 pm by Margaret Taylor
Why does Nadler want the redacted portions of the Mueller report and the underlying materials? [read post]
8 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Jonathan Shaub
In particular, grand jury material has never itself been considered a component of executive privilege. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Once a committee rules that an act of criminal contempt has occurred, the Speaker of the House or Senate President refers the matter to the appropriate U.S. attorney’s office, “whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:04 am by Jonathan Shaub
Nor is the direction certain to hold up in any subsequent judicial proceedings. [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Although Barr may have initially hoped to treat it as a confidential internal memo, he was compelled to promise a redacted version, purged of materials that might compromise ongoing cases, reveal grand jury material or intelligence methods, or harm the personal privacy of persons not charged with crimes. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:04 pm by Mikhaila Fogel
According to Politico Politico, the district court's contempt order against Miller for failing to appear before the grand jury is set to go into effect in a week if Miller does not obtain relief. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by John Jascob
In contrast, the grand jury indictment alleges that Holmes and Balwani defrauded doctors and patients and that hundreds of patients paid for blood tests and results that were inaccurate, unreliable, and improperly validated. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
When the President gave the order, “substantial evidence” (to quote the Report) existed that the President was aware that he was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present evidence of the President’s criminality to a grand jury, which satisfies the nexus requirement. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm by John Floyd
This procedural rule, however, does not insulate from disclosure documents and information either presented to or considered by a grand jury. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
  Does that claim have any legal basis? [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Tim Zubizarreta
The report is redacted according to the Attorney General’s stated framework of Grand Jury, Harm to Ongoing Matter, Investigative Technique and Personal Privacy. [read post]
Despite being warned by Chief of Staff Reince Priebus not to discuss Russia matters, Trump brought up the Steele report and whether the FBI could investigate to prove the allegations contained in it were false. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm by Lev Sugarman
Beginning in June 2016, [Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter] forecast to senior Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton. [read post]