Search for: "Matter of Hong v Hong"
Results 301 - 320
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2022, 1:59 am
McKee v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm
They also found that MGA owed Mattel $6 million for copyright infringement, while Larian owed $3 million in distributions he'd received from Bratz-related sales, and MGA Hong Kong owed $1 million. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The first, was in the case of Ting Lan Hong v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 2995 (QB) – on which we have already commented. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:19 am
Porsche A.G. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:00 am
Hong v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:00 am
Hong v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Spicy IP) India trendy on IP matters! [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(Spicy IP) India trendy on IP matters! [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am
March 2020 Several airlines have announced their intention to ground their operations in light of Covid-19 and lockdowns announced by a number of countries. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You have come to the right place (IP Dragon) Court protects transliteration of well-known international enterprise name (International Law Office) How to go to China for innovation (China Law Blog) Costa Rica Costa Rica approves Free Trade Agreement between US, Central America and Dominican Republic (CAFTA) (IP tango) Europe EU judges on Community patent and court (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) European IP forum considers standards-setting (Managing Intellectual… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:52 am
Here’s an excerpt from the opinion that Rakhshan was trying to get removed, Rakhshan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Lee J held that the although the publisher believed publication of the matter was in the public interest, the belief was not reasonable in the circumstances [384]. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Mr Fox responded to the Claimant’s allegations that his criticism of supermarket Sainsbury’s support of the Black Lives Matter movement demonstrated that he was a racist, by callin [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
