Search for: "Matter of Perez" Results 301 - 320 of 1,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The appeals court concludes that Perez’s firing was improper: First, although Perez used vulgar attacks and referenced the supervisor’s family, the subject matter of the message included workplace concerns. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says it is not, for the following reasons:First, even though Perez’s message was dominated by vulgar attacks on McSweeney and his family, the “subject matter” of the message included workplace concerns—management’s allegedly disrespectful treatment of employees, and the upcoming union election. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:41 am by Daniel Schwartz
Management learned of the post, investigated, and then fired Perez, just days before the election. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer did argue that the Board’s decision—that “Perez’ comments were not so egregious as to exceed the Act’s protection”—was not supported by “substantial evidence” in the record. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:44 am by Jon Hyman
First, even though Perez’s message was dominated by vulgar attacks on McSweeney and his family, the “subject matter” of the message included workplace concerns—management’s allegedly disrespectful treatment of employees, and the upcoming union election. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 8:39 am by Phil Dixon
Perez, 22 U.S. 579 (1824) (no double jeopardy violation with mistrial after hung jury). [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 8:39 am by Phil Dixon
Perez, 22 U.S. 579 (1824) (no double jeopardy violation with mistrial after hung jury). [read post]