Search for: "Matter of State of New York v John P."
Results 301 - 320
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
See Cordelia Fine, “Biased But Brilliant,” New York Times (July 30, 2011) (describing confirmation bias and irrational loyalty of scientists to their hobby-horse hypotheses). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
" In McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
” Eric Turkewitz of the New York Personal Injury Law Blog writes about Watching a massive Saturn V rocket blast off to the moon can leave quite an impression on an 11-year-old. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Chadbourn rarely spoke about personal matters to other people. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently… [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:39 am
Holder, Jr. to John A. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:40 am
And according to a couple of seemingly respectable law professors, Joseph Hoffman and Nancy King in a New York Times op-ed a couple of weeks ago, and a new book, it's damnably inefficient. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
John Fund v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
John P. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
Arguing for a Nevada state ethics agency will be John P. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
John Hancock Ins. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
New York New York University, 2006. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
In his Report (pp. 42-45, paras. 55-68), Referee Crespo acknowledges New York case law -- at least in the matrimonial valuation context -- permitting key person discounts, including a key person discount "combined as part of a marketability discount" (citing Beckerman v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
