Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 8:15 am
The Social Security Disability process is lengthy and its rules are not straightforward. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:42 am
If claimant is deemed able to work for any period of time at any job, United States Social Security Administration (SSA) may deny benefits. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
That broadening has made it possible to offer the course not just to first year law students, but also to graduate students in the social sciences and in international affairs, as a grounding in the legal systems that are important in their respective fields. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
The Social Security Administration outlines Evidentiary Requirements for SSDI claimants. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
That Defendant was the advocacy alliance which was allegedly authorized by the Social Security Administration Act as the resident’s payee for Social Security benefits and manage the same for the resident. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that as relevant in this action Retirement and Social Security Law §212(1) "there shall be no earning limitations under the provisions of [Retirement and Social Security Law § 212] on or after the calendar year in which any retired person attains age [65]. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 11:55 am
The Federal law authorizes each state to enact legislation permitting employers and their workers’ compensation insurance companies (“E/C”), rather than the Social Security Administration, to take the offset. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Businesses may not even realize how serious these new security threats can be. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) awarded Shepherd disability defendants, finding that his “sub-optimally controlled depression” impaired his “overall functioning . . . and effectively render[ed] him disabled. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:09 am
See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Content posted or displayed on our websites may be found objectionable by PRC regulatory authorities and may subject us to penalties and other administrative actions. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
In 2005, Succar v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
The Social Security Administration denied her claim, and Ms. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:03 am
Social Security Administration (SSA) and is designed for people who had worked their whole life and can no longer work due to a disability. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:43 am
In the Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm
Regardless, all should remain mindful that the prior administration’s rules remain on the books and may pose a continued risk in litigation filed by plan participants and beneficiaries. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
