Search for: "Montgomery v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 5:41 pm by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Colbert County Northwest Alabama Health Care Authority d/b/a Helen Keller Hospital v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am by Jennifer Canfield
  Like the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit assumed arguendo that such a right existed, recognizing that “[t]he Supreme Court of the United States has explicitly declined to decide whether there is a constitutional privacy interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, the Court will spell out when a mandatory minimum prison sentence is required under a federal law against child pornography, based on a prior conviction under state law for sexual abuse. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
The Court has already granted cert. to answer the first question in Montgomery v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:13 am by Amy Howe
” An op-ed in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) urges the Court to grant review in Spokeo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:29 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
” [9] The Court also noted that the English courts (in subsequent cases such as Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust and Chester v Afshar) had quietly ceased to follow Sidaway‘s adoption of the Bolam test. [read post]