Search for: "Moore v. Marks" Results 301 - 320 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2013, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Subsequently, in fact, the Court adopted this broader view eight years later in Moore v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:12 pm by Steve Baird
Muller-Moore will ask a federal district court judge to declare that the “Eat More Kale” mark is not infringing or diluting Chick-fil-A’s “Eat Mor Chikin” mark, since a federal court decision declaring no likelihood of confusion would compel the USPTO to withdraw the likelihood of confusion refusal based on Chick-fil-A’s “Eat Mor Chikin” mark. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The list is in alphabetical order, with the top of the list being tags that were originally written with quotation marks. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
On the morning of July 15, 2010, Officer Mark Moore of the Tulsa Police Department (`TPD’) responded to a call from DeGraffenreid's residence relating to child pornography. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 January 2013, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick, Aikens and Black LJJ) will give judgment in the libel costs case of Henry v NGN. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:37 pm by The Complex Litigator
Mark Moore and Denise Diaz authored portions of an amicus brief on behalf of CAOC, in support of plaintiff. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:37 pm by The Complex Litigator
Mark Moore and Denise Diaz authored portions of an amicus brief on behalf of CAOC, in support of plaintiff. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]