Search for: "Moore v. Smith" Results 301 - 320 of 410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd,… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Patentology) WIPO issues PCT Notification No. 196 (IPKat) PCT Applications – Top national stage countries for 2010 (inovia) Licensee buys Licensor in advance of IPO: Smith Electric Vehicles UK and Smith Electric Vehicles US (IP finance) In defence of trolls (IP Factor) Global – Copyright ACTA the sequel: The Transpacific Partnership Agreement (Public Knowledge) Australia Warning labels threaten tobacco trade-marks – Or do they? [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm by lpbncontracts
Over at Conglomerate, Gordon Smith weaves the connections between growing up in Wisconsin, teaching Hoffman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Western Auto Supply Co., 18 P.3d 49, 56-58 (Alaska 2001) (§12); Smith v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
 He distinguishes Smith by relying on a passage from the vacated panel decision from the Sixth Circuit in Warshak v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:14 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued July 28, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rivers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
Discerning readers will however note that this issue also lay at the heart of last week's Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), noted here by the IPKat. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:12 pm by A
Not sure how much national attention this story got, but it received some publicity here in Chicago...This opinion today from the Illinois State Bar Association's "E-clips":Moore v. [read post]