Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena" Results 301 - 320 of 1,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2016, 3:11 am by R. David Donoghue
Because Comcast had not objected to the subpoena, the Court denied Doe’s motion. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark A great deal of media attention has been paid to the contents of Anthony Weiner’s laptop computer, including the existence of emails  between or among Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:18 pm by Jon Katz
Virginia’s Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s refusal to compel Guevara’s testimony, concluding that the trial court “properly balanced appellant’s Sixth Amendment right to compel evidence in his favor against the witness’ Fifth Amendment right to be free from self-incrimination and we affirm the judgment of the court granting the motion to quash the subpoena for Guevara. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am by Andrew Serwin and Adam Fleisher
The district court, in denying Microsoft’s motion to quash, had reasoned that the SCA warrant was like a subpoena because, in the words of the Second Circuit, “it is executed by a service provider rather than a government law enforcement agent, and because it does not require the presence of an agent during its execution. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
A Wikipedia entry explains what a motion to quash is designed to accomplish. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 2:42 pm by Timothy Tobin and James Denvil
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit today unanimously reversed a lower court’s denial of Microsoft’s motion to quash a warrant seeking the content of emails for a customer of its Outlook.com email service. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Schachtman
With minor modifications to the plaintiffs’ subpoena, he denied Colgate’s motion to quash, and allowed the plaintiffs proceed with their investigation. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:06 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Tharp denied various Does’ motions to quash subpoenas to their respective internet service providers (“ISP”) as well as one Doe’s Fed. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:58 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Darrah denied Doe 7’s motion to quash plaintiff Glacier Films’ subpoena to third party Comcast, Doe 7’s alleged internet service provider (“ISP”) and motion to dismiss for improper joinder in this BitTorrent case regarding the motion picture American Heist. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The judge denied the motion, in part on the grounds that SAS had waived objections to service and the jurisdiction by failing to object timely to the subpoena. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
My expectation is that if there is a motion to quash the subpoena, then Judge Young, the presiding judge, will unseal the docket at least in part, so that the public will have access to those proceedings. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 10:24 am by Douglas C. Melcher
 at 7-20, the Court of Appeals held in a split decision that a defendant who files and prevails on a special motion to quash a subpoena may be awarded attorney fees “without showing that the suit prompting the subpoena was frivolous or improperly motivated. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 10:24 am by Douglas C. Melcher
 at 7-20, the Court of Appeals held in a split decision that a defendant who files and prevails on a special motion to quash a subpoena may be awarded attorney fees “without showing that the suit prompting the subpoena was frivolous or improperly motivated. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am by Law Lady
Criminal law -- Discovery -- Appeals -- Certiorari -- Where defense had issued subpoenas duces tecum to various third parties without permission of trial court and without notifying state of its intent to issue the subpoenas, and state, upon discovering that the subpoenas had been issued, filed a motion to compel production of all evidence produced pursuant to the illegal subpoenas, state is not entitled to writ of certiorari to have appellate court… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
  The court also explains that the Republic of Kazakhstanopposed the motion to quash. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(No. 15-663): 1 Motion to Quash [8 Response sealed] 15 Reply 28 Magistrate Judge Report 29 Objections 30 Response to Objections 36 DCT Order [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am by Jamie Williams
Both Facebook and EFF opposed Kazakhstan’s motion, and Facebook moved to quash the subpoena. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 37 Motion to Quash 40-1 Opposition 42 Reply 45 DCT Order Granting Motion to Quash An excerpt: Matt seeks documents in the possession of the Fort Belknap Community Council. [read post]