Search for: "NORRIS V. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am by Rick Pildes
Tipaldo, minimum-wage laws on the books in a third of the states, in some cases, for decades. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:59 pm by Adam Gillette
This conclusion is at odds with one reached by the Eighth Circuit in Sasser v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Nebraska Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains a list of State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, this could be provided by statute or by rule, as it is, for instance, under the Norris-LaGuardia Act for certain labor injunctions. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 15 February 2019 Norris J handed down judgment in the case of Winstone v MGN [2019] EWHC 265 (Ch) [pdf]  He held that MGN was not entitled to claim privilege in respect of comments made by the Chairman of Trinity Mirror after an AGM. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Fiona de Londras
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland for an example from our past and the persistent operation of s. 62 of the Housing Act 1966 in light of cases such as Connors, McCann and Kay for what looks certain to be a repeat performance in the future unless some legislative change is… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland (ECHR 1988) for an example from our past. [read post]